College Football Power Rankings: Expansion Continued…
For the last few weeks, it seems that the college football world has been consumed with talks of league expansion, specifically in reference to the Big 10 conference. What interests us here at the Kickoffzone blog is how that will affect the movers and shakers, in terms of how it could affect their power rankings, or in other words, whether it will have a positive or negative affect on their chances to play in a BCS bowl game or the National Championship Game.
The Sporting News is taking a specific look at how the movements could affect each specific conference, in regards to their BCS bidding power and their attraction to the game representatives. Concerning the Big XII, they have this to say:
The only scenario that could severely damage the Big 12: The Big Ten takes any combination of Nebraska, Oklahoma and Missouri, and the Pac 10 takes Colorado. At that point, Texas would be forced to look at other options despite its long-term goal of a healthy, prosperous Big 12.
Concerning the Pac-10:
Count the Pac-10 as proactive in the search for more dollars. In February, less than seven months after taking charge, new commissioner Larry Scott said the league would “very seriously” consider adding two schools.
Colorado has emerged as the most popular candidate, but the Pac-10’s biggest jackpot would come from adding Texas and Texas A&M. No other set of potential television markets, including Denver, Salt Lake City (with Utah and BYU) and Las Vegas (UNLV) would carry the Lone Star State’s economic sway.
Even if the Pac-10 doesn’t expand, it could instigate a significant college football change. Scott has said the league will consider proposing NCAA legislation that would allow for a conference championship game in a 10-team league. Current legislation mandates that leagues include at least 12 teams, split into two divisions, to host a title game.
If one were to break down the conferences by tradition, they would have to rank the Pac 10, the Big 10, and the SEC as the standard bearers. They’ve been around much longer than the Big XII, and have generally produced the most revenue in television deals (with the exception of independent Notre Dame). Considering how two are now apparently considering expansion, how would the SEC, generally considered the most dominant conference in the country, respond? Tony Barnhart writes that the SEC can not ignore what goes on in these other conferences:
So why mess with a great thing? Why not let the Big Ten do its thing while the SEC keeps doing what has made it so successful?
Here’s why: “If you are a commissioner your No. 1 job is not to take care of today,” said former SEC commissioner Roy Kramer. “Your No. 1 job is to look at least 10 years down the road to where your conference is going to be and where the competition is going to be.”
SEC Commissioner Mike Slive told me recently that the his conference will have a plan in place should the Big Ten expand to 16 teams, which could totally change the landscape of college athletics as we know it in just a few years. The SEC may never execute the plan, but there will be a plan.
That’s right, folks. If you thought the current BCS system wasn’t complicated enough, well, think again… College football is big business. In the end, the powers that be will always want to have the top two teams playing for the title, whether it be through a playoff or a power ranking system. However, for that to ever work, there will be a whole lot of red tape that will need to be cut through to ever make that dream a reality.